Tasty slices of Chicago sports from our editors
Today Teddy Greenstein comments on the speculation at the Michigan football blog, MGoBlog, that the athletic director for the University of Michigan might try to lure away Northwestern’s Pat Fitzgerald. Greenstein is unambiguous about his thoughts — Fitzgerald is too committed to the Wildcats to leave — and lists several good reasons for his opinion, including Fitz’s ties to Northwestern and Chicago as well as Northwestern’s willingness to increase Fitz’s salary should they need to.
But, I don’t want to talk about where Greenstein is right. No, I want to touch on where I think he’s wrong. Greenstein mentions two positive reasons for Fitzgerald possibly leaving, beyond a raise. The first is a “better chance to win big” and the second an “easier time recruiting.”
As to the first, is that really true anymore? Yes, I know Michigan was a powerhouse in the conference and nationally, but after the apocalypse that was Rich Rodriguez and defensive coordinator Greg Robinson, I’m not sure that’s the reality of this team. Michigan and Northwestern had identical records this year, but that was AFTER Northwestern lost almost the entirety of their offense in Dan Persa. And, while both teams lost their bowl games, Michigan did so in a much more excruciating fashion than Northwestern. As such, I think the reality right now is that Pat Fitzgerald has about even chances of “winning big” in the next two years at Northwestern as he would at Michigan.
Then there’s the recruiting issue. Yes, Northwestern has historically had trouble in that department. High academic standards and decades of football futility don’t make it easy to lure high school seniors to your program. But, as Northwestern has a continual presence during bowl season that has begun to change. As for Michigan, their once solid brand has been diminished by the chaos of coaching changes and constant identity problems. While Northwestern has a consistent identity on offense, can that be said about the Wolverines? If you can’t tell prospective recruits whether they’re likely to be a major piece of the offensive/defensive puzzle, or whether their coach is likely to be around after a year or two, it becomes much harder to lure them in. In a nutshell, Northwestern’s recruiting efforts are on the upswing, while Michigan’s most certainly are not.
Given all this, it seems that there is every reason for Pat Fitzgerald to stay at Northwestern, and no reason for him to leave for Michigan.
Comments
Two factors that would argue against that
110,000 seats in Michigan that are routinely sold out for the Wolverines, even during the past three RichRod seasons, and the very very deep pockets of the UM boosters.
The lure of any football program stems from facilities, fan support, and recruiting. Michigan has the money to keep up with anyone in terms of facilities, it has a very deep and very large fan base that doesn’t get a lot of competition from the pro team in Detroit, and it recruits nationally, even under these past three seasons, Michigan has pulled in better recruiting classes than Northwestern and Illinois. Fact is, the Michigan job is still an attractive job for someone who can put together a winner, and doesn’t mind all of the schmoozing that goes into it too.
I don’t think that Fitz is going to Michigan, but not because Northwestern is a “better job.”
Hailtotheorange.com
by Joe Kutsunis on Jan 6, 2011 8:05 PM CST reply actions
Didn't say Northwestern was a "better job"
Just that I don’t think that over the next two years Michigan has a significant recruiting advantage or a better chance of “winning big” over Northwestern, given the destruction that RichRod hath wrought…
Off Tackle Empire - Ruling on the Big Ten since 2008.
by Hilary Lee on Jan 6, 2011 9:43 PM CST up reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed